Episode 12

full
Published on:

14th Feb 2022

12. Metaverse Religion, McDonald's Virtual Trademarks, GTA NFT, Gala Games $5B Spending, Sequoia Polygon Investment

In this episode, we discuss faith and worship in the metaverse, McDonald's filing trademarks for virtual goods and restaurants, Take-Two Interactive considers bringing NFTs to the world of Grand Theft Auto, Gala Games' plans to spend $5 billion in order to expand its NFT offering, Sequoia Capital India leads a $450 million investment round in Polygon blockchain, and so much more!

Episode 12 Keywords: Faith, Worship, Metaverse, McDonald's, Trademarks, Virtual Goods, Virtual Restaurants, Take-Two Interactive, Grand Theft Auto, NFTs, Gala Games, Sequoia Capital India investment, Polygon blockchain

Transcript
Unknown:

Welcome to the metaphysics podcast. The Metaverse and web three are bringing about the

Unknown:

biggest revolution since the internet itself. With your hosts Paul the prophet Dawalibi And Jeff the

Unknown:

juice Cohen. We will be bringing you the latest Metaverse, business news and insight into what it

Unknown:

all means. The meta business podcast starts now.

Paul Dawalibi:

From the boardroom to the metaverse. This is the meta business podcast. I am

Paul Dawalibi:

Paul Dawalibi. I'm joined today by my friend and co host, Jeff, the juice Cohen. For those of you

Paul Dawalibi:

who are new to the meta business podcast. What we do here is we cover the biggest Metaverse, topics

Paul Dawalibi:

and news of the week, but we look at all of it through a business and C suite lens, we dissect,

Paul Dawalibi:

we analyze the business implications of everything happening in this Metaverse industry. Jeff, how

Paul Dawalibi:

you doing this week?

Jeff Cohen:

I'm doing good. I'm battle battle in here. Got a little little case of the COVID. So

Jeff Cohen:

you know if I started, middle, you know, a second time suck, and I podcasted through both of them.

Jeff Cohen:

So you did you know, hon Metaverse news never stops. And so we will always be here no matter

Jeff Cohen:

what. But yeah, definitely, you can probably hear it in my voice a little bit congested. But we've

Jeff Cohen:

just have so much going on that, you know, I couldn't take a week off. You never know who would

Jeff Cohen:

even get to replace me. I don't know if there's anyone who could.

Paul Dawalibi:

I mean, I mean, really the juice. No one can replace the juice. That's just the

Paul Dawalibi:

reality. Just like no one can replace the Prophet. You can't replace greatness like that. Sure. I

Paul Dawalibi:

will say congratulations, by the way. 12 episode, this is episode 12. And every episode has been the

Paul Dawalibi:

audience has been bigger than the last. So thank you all for tuning in every week, we really

Paul Dawalibi:

appreciate it. I know I've gotten a lot of great feedback from people that you guys are really

Paul Dawalibi:

loving the content. And Jeff and I really love doing it. So, Jeff, let's jump into some Metaverse

Paul Dawalibi:

news this week. I think I have to start with it's maybe become sort of this shows. Hallmark, I would

Paul Dawalibi:

say is I've got to jump into something that's maybe the most important Metaverse news this week.

Paul Dawalibi:

Nevermind the $5 billion of investment or five and a half billion dollars in investment. This story

Paul Dawalibi:

definitely took the cake for me. The headline here is faith in the metaverse a quest for community

Paul Dawalibi:

and fellowship, and the articles talking about how some churches and in this case they were using a

Paul Dawalibi:

Mormon church as an example that some churches are turning to the metaverse and VR as a way to

Paul Dawalibi:

deliver service services to their congregation. So it says here ranging from spiritual meditations

Paul Dawalibi:

and fantasy worlds, to traditional Christian worship services with virtual sacraments. In hyper

Paul Dawalibi:

realistic church like environments. Their devotees, says, say the experience offers a

Paul Dawalibi:

version of fellowship that's just as genuine as what can be found at a brick and mortar temple.

Paul Dawalibi:

And then they have a quote here, which was the most I liked it, the most important aspect to me,

Paul Dawalibi:

which was very real, was the closer connection with God that I felt in my short time here. This

Paul Dawalibi:

is the quote from the founder of something called from VR Church, which was founded in 2016 by DJ

Paul Dawalibi:

Soto, a former high school teacher and pastor, and and there's images here, which if you're watching,

Paul Dawalibi:

if you're listening, unfortunately can't see it. But images here of some of the virtual worlds, and

Paul Dawalibi:

Pastor DJ Soto who started VR church, I'm curious, Jeff, short, man, yeah, we won't spend too much

Paul Dawalibi:

time on this. But as we see, and we I think we've used the first story now in almost every episode,

Paul Dawalibi:

as it is a great example of the metaverse and VR and these concepts infiltrating aspects of our

Paul Dawalibi:

lives that maybe we wouldn't expect. Where do you put worship and church? On this list of sort of,

Paul Dawalibi:

did you expect the metaverse to get there that, you know,

Jeff Cohen:

we're gonna have religions and I'm interested more to see, you know, the first

Jeff Cohen:

Metaverse only religion or something like a Metaverse cult, which maybe would be more more

Jeff Cohen:

exciting. But you know, this is this is actually I think this is sort of a creative way for you know,

Jeff Cohen:

this, this church to reach out to a larger congregation. And we've seen in the in the 90s and

Jeff Cohen:

early 2000s. Even now, like televangelists have made hundreds of millions of dollars like

Jeff Cohen:

broadcasting on on TV and getting in front of a bigger audience. A lot of them I would say are a

Jeff Cohen:

little bit sleazy and maybe frauds, but it makes sense. I mean, I bet this is gonna catch on. And

Jeff Cohen:

it could bring in a new audience or a younger demographic to the church, and then maybe you

Jeff Cohen:

typically see. So kudos to the church for for kind of being innovative. But yeah, I'm waiting for the

Jeff Cohen:

first metaverse. I think that's going to be going to be interesting that the Branch Davidians of the

Jeff Cohen:

of the metaverse or something like that will be entertained.

Paul Dawalibi:

The good news is, if you drink the Kool Aid in the metaverse, you'll be fine.

Jeff Cohen:

That's your avatar only die.

Paul Dawalibi:

Your, your your avatar may suffer, but you'll be fine. No, but seriously, like from a

Paul Dawalibi:

business standpoint, I think one of the reasons the business of religion has declined in years,

Paul Dawalibi:

right, like attendance, things like that. Right. Some of the, the specific numbers around religion

Paul Dawalibi:

have declined, is because, at least anecdotally, I think there's this sort of barrier, right, which

Paul Dawalibi:

is you have to go and it's only on a Sunday morning. And, and, you know, if you don't make it

Paul Dawalibi:

for that one hour, you sort of miss I'm talking in this case, Catholic church, but you know, all

Paul Dawalibi:

religions sort of have the schedule around around services and things like that. But does the

Paul Dawalibi:

metaverse potentially bring religion back in a serious way? Or bring maybe people who had not

Paul Dawalibi:

considered religion before back as sort of a customer? Because it's so easily accessible?

Paul Dawalibi:

Right, I can be in my I can be in my underwear on my couch, on a Tuesday evening. And I don't have

Paul Dawalibi:

to put my suit on on a Sunday morning.

Jeff Cohen:

Yeah, I mean, I guess talking a little more abstractly, we're definitely we're talking

Jeff Cohen:

about religion a little bit as a business, which is, which is interesting. Just in general, fair, I

Jeff Cohen:

think just in general, when you whenever you widen distribution and create more accessibility and

Jeff Cohen:

engagement, you're going to see sort of metrics like that go up, and you're going to see people

Jeff Cohen:

coming more often and, and getting more involved and kind of widening the distribution. So short

Jeff Cohen:

answer, yes. Do I think this is gonna change religion as we know it? Probably Probably not. But

Jeff Cohen:

I think someone like this is innovative and could find a little bit of a following, and certainly

Jeff Cohen:

grow their their congregation more than they would, if you will.

Paul Dawalibi:

It's funny, and the one the last, I'll end on this, and then we'll move on. But if

Paul Dawalibi:

you look at every pop culture kind of portrayal of the metaverse was whether it's a book or a movie,

Paul Dawalibi:

for the most part, there's always a, you know, a messianic or like a worshipped figure who's sort

Paul Dawalibi:

of like the master of the metaverse, so to speak, like a Christ like figure, whether you're talking

Paul Dawalibi:

about sort of like the matrix or Ready Player One, or, you know, all these modern portrayals of what

Paul Dawalibi:

we might call meta versus it's interesting, because I wonder if that's where we do end up

Paul Dawalibi:

right.

Jeff Cohen:

Are you saying someone's gonna create someone's gonna create a religion around that

Jeff Cohen:

figure?

Paul Dawalibi:

Yeah, or, you know, some someone who's a leader in this in these virtual worlds

Paul Dawalibi:

because they're either a leader of a company or whatever, becomes almost like a, a religious

Paul Dawalibi:

figure who is worshipped. If they have some, some hand in the creation of this Metaverse, right? You

Paul Dawalibi:

almost create a potentially messianic figure. Because we're creating a whole new universe a

Paul Dawalibi:

whole new world, right? Yeah, it's interesting. And it'll be interesting to see how, you know,

Paul Dawalibi:

traditional religions compete in the same way. A lot of traditional industries will have to

Paul Dawalibi:

compete. Let's move on to McDonald's McDonald's in the news, and, and, you know, we talked about

Paul Dawalibi:

McDonald's in the, in the context of Elon Musk, if you remember. But this McDonald's story I thought

Paul Dawalibi:

was interesting. And the headline here is McDonald's files trademark for Metaverse based

Paul Dawalibi:

virtual restaurant. So they've applied for a trademark for virtual goods, services and virtual

Paul Dawalibi:

restaurants and cafes. You know, their expectation, I guess, is that they will need to

Paul Dawalibi:

operate potentially McDonald's restaurants and virtual worlds, so they want to make sure they own

Paul Dawalibi:

the name. This follows Panera has filing for Panera verse. And other big companies like Nike,

Paul Dawalibi:

Walmart Skechers, who have all made similar filings in the past. It says here, this in this

Paul Dawalibi:

Forbes article, it says when you see this critical mass of large companies making this many new

Paul Dawalibi:

trademark filings, it's very clear, this is coming. Do you buy this? Jeff, one of the things

Paul Dawalibi:

here says, you know, every brand is gonna make a filing like this within the next 12 months. So

Paul Dawalibi:

first of all, do you buy that piece of it?

Jeff Cohen:

I think I saw I do by that. I mean, you know, every time you use words like every it's

Jeff Cohen:

it's hard to necessarily get on board with that. But you're seeing this 100% It's it. Brands are

Jeff Cohen:

moving to the metaverse totally believe that. And I'll sort of give a little bit of both sides to

Jeff Cohen:

the story because I kind of see both sides. On on one hand I mean, it's it's a little bit like when

Jeff Cohen:

the internet first started, I mean every brand needed to eventually create a website. Some did it

Jeff Cohen:

early. Some waited till very late, but you needed if you were a brand, you needed some sort of

Jeff Cohen:

presence on the worldwide web. If we assume that the metaverse is the next iteration of the World

Jeff Cohen:

Wide Web, the internet, every brand will need some sort of presence in the metaverse. I think I buy

Jeff Cohen:

that. That's a logical argument. The problem that where it breaks down for me is with a brand like

Jeff Cohen:

McDonald's, like I just don't see, like brands like Nike, brands, like Under Armour, something

Jeff Cohen:

where you're selling clothing, digital items, something people wear to represent themselves.

Jeff Cohen:

We've talked about this a lot. I'm fully on board with that. I think that makes all the sense in the

Jeff Cohen:

world that people are going to want to kind of show their show off their avatars were things in

Jeff Cohen:

terms of eating food in the metaverse like, I I'm not sure I see a need to eat food in a digital

Jeff Cohen:

world. But you, you don't digital worlds do not have the same constraints as physical worlds. We

Jeff Cohen:

don't really need to consume food in order to have our avatar, walk around and be in the world. Maybe

Jeff Cohen:

that will change which there will be resource management, stuff like that. I kind of hope it

Jeff Cohen:

doesn't because, you know, I just don't think it's a constraint we need to add into the world in the

Jeff Cohen:

metaverse. And even when McDonald's it's like it's a it's a fast casual restaurant or not investiga

Jeff Cohen:

it's fast food. Like there's nothing sexy about eating McDonald's. Like if this was some five star

Jeff Cohen:

restaurant wanted to create like a really cool virtual experience of like going to like a

Jeff Cohen:

Michelin star restaurant. I think I could get on board with that too. But there's just like nothing

Jeff Cohen:

cool about going to a McDonald's and eating a Big Mac. I don't know, tell me I'm wrong.

Paul Dawalibi:

Oh, look. On our sister podcast business of esports. We often have this argument

Paul Dawalibi:

of like esports teams pretending to be media companies and lifestyle brands. Right? Could you

Paul Dawalibi:

make the argument that this is McDonald's going? We're more than just fast food. We're kind of a

Paul Dawalibi:

lifestyle brand. Right? And therefore, we need to have a presence in the metaverse that is that is,

Paul Dawalibi:

you know, branded McDonald's. And and so that's my first sort of counter argument is, could you argue

Paul Dawalibi:

that Panera and McDonald's are actually lifestyle brands? And I'm sure the people in those marketing

Paul Dawalibi:

departments want to believe that they are right. And we could think that's silly. And we could

Paul Dawalibi:

think that's totally off base because they're fundamentally just the Egg McMuffin and Big Mac

Paul Dawalibi:

company, but like, they may see themselves as lifestyle brands and how they fit into people's

Paul Dawalibi:

lives may translate to the metaverse and it may not be about selling a burger in the metaverse,

Paul Dawalibi:

but it may be about selling McDonald's branded whatever, or giving away McDonald's branded

Paul Dawalibi:

whatever. The bigger sort of implication I saw from this is, and you brought up a great point in

Paul Dawalibi:

the early days of the.com era, right of web, what we're calling even web one, right? Most companies

Paul Dawalibi:

didn't go and like immediately secure their business. name.com. Right. But the reality is, a

Paul Dawalibi:

lot of companies were actually quite slow to doing that, because they didn't see the value. I see

Paul Dawalibi:

this interesting trend here where companies don't want to make that mistake sort of again, right.

Paul Dawalibi:

And there's there's a couple implications there, which I think are interesting one, you're going to

Paul Dawalibi:

get a lot of squatters, right, who listen to this podcast or read this news. And go wait a second.

Paul Dawalibi:

Now I'm going to go and try and squat on a whole bunch of, you know, names in the metaverse. That

Paul Dawalibi:

was my first thought. And then there's my second thought immediately after was, but wait a second,

Paul Dawalibi:

like what this means fundamentally, is that all the real estate conversations we've been having in

Paul Dawalibi:

the metaverse right are sort of meaningless, that the trademark here is way more valuable than

Paul Dawalibi:

owning a virtual person. piece of land like a.com, to me is like real estate. It's a virtual piece of

Paul Dawalibi:

land that you own and no one else can own right? But putting up something that looks like a

Paul Dawalibi:

McDonald's in the metaverse, you'd have to buy all the land to stop someone from putting that up. The

Paul Dawalibi:

trademark happens to be kind of a legal shortcut here that protects them from all meta versus

Paul Dawalibi:

right, whether it's decentraland or sandbox, so that they don't need to necessarily go make plays

Paul Dawalibi:

in each of these meta verses today. They know long term, they've protected their trademark in this

Paul Dawalibi:

general application.

Jeff Cohen:

I see what you're saying. I mean, we kind of need Jimmy on here to bring the legal, you

Jeff Cohen:

know, to dive deeper into the legal workings like I don't know how that would actually work. I guess

Jeff Cohen:

what you're saying is the brand is more important than then kind of the having the real estate or

Jeff Cohen:

you know them being first to market there.

Paul Dawalibi:

Is that what you're saying? What I'm saying is I think the brands are going to have

Paul Dawalibi:

an easier time. On one hand protecting They're their brands in the metaverse. And on the other

Paul Dawalibi:

hand, they have a harder time because this is far more decentralized than then the web is right?

Paul Dawalibi:

Like, the web has only one McDonald's dot com, right? Whereas in the metaverse today or this

Paul Dawalibi:

environment today, you're saying there'll be multiple McDonald's in this metaphor, there's 50

Paul Dawalibi:

Different meta verses right? And McDonald's if I'm the company is not going to go build a McDonald's

Paul Dawalibi:

in decentraland, and build a McDonald's and sandbox and build a McDonald's here and build a

Paul Dawalibi:

gun, right? Like, I don't know if that makes sense. Whereas, like, just trademarking the brand,

Paul Dawalibi:

for this application sort of gives them blanket protection, until the ecosystem has sort of sorted

Paul Dawalibi:

itself out.

Jeff Cohen:

So here's a quite more of an existential like a higher level question. Will

Jeff Cohen:

Will the brands that are popular kind of IRL slash even in web one, web two? will those be the brands

Jeff Cohen:

that dominate the metaverse, you think? Or will we see completely new brands? I suspect the answer is

Jeff Cohen:

probably a little bit of both. But where do you fall on that spectrum? Like, it's going to be

Jeff Cohen:

completely new brands native to the metaverse versus like, Hey, if you're a McDonald's, you're

Jeff Cohen:

going to come in, and you're going to be the virtual burger shop or, you know, virtual casual

Jeff Cohen:

restaurant, as I keep calling it fast, casual, fast food restaurant.

Paul Dawalibi:

I mean, it's a really good question, Jeff. And I think, you know, I'm

Paul Dawalibi:

guessing we agree on this, that there's probably, if you look historically at what happened with web

Paul Dawalibi:

one, web two, and we're talking about this as web three, like if history remains consistent, there

Paul Dawalibi:

will always be like this mixture, right, some old brands will make the transition successfully, will

Paul Dawalibi:

succeed will do very well. Some traditional brands will not make the transition and may fall by the

Paul Dawalibi:

wayside and they disappear. And then you will get sort of web three native brands that grew up there

Paul Dawalibi:

live there live and breathe that space and exist only there. It's definitely going to be a

Paul Dawalibi:

combination, right? McDonald's, trademark or not presence in the metaverse or not, is not going

Paul Dawalibi:

anywhere, right? Like if they say, We don't care about the metaverse. People are not going to stop

Paul Dawalibi:

eating Big Macs, right? That's just they can afford to miss this boat. Now. And I mean, from a

Paul Dawalibi:

present standpoint, from a marketing standpoint, that's more questionable. Do I think brands can

Paul Dawalibi:

just sort of close their eyes and say, We don't need to reach this audience? That I think is a is

Paul Dawalibi:

a bigger mistake. I don't know. Do you agree with that?

Jeff Cohen:

Yeah, no, I do agree with that. I actually think it's interesting that you're

Jeff Cohen:

talking you kind of right there, just at the end, sort of separated the marketing to people in the

Jeff Cohen:

metaverse versus actually being kind of present in the metaverse. Do you? Do you see that as a big

Jeff Cohen:

distinction? Or is that just something that popped into your head?

Paul Dawalibi:

It's, uh, you know, I know I'm gonna get comments from people saying it's like,

Paul Dawalibi:

purely semantic but like, McDonald's having a presence in the metaverse is a marketing

Paul Dawalibi:

activation, right? Like, they're not doing it to Sell Burgers in the metaverse. They're doing it

Paul Dawalibi:

to, you know, expose the brand to more people. So it is a little bit of just like us twisting

Paul Dawalibi:

language. But I think I genuinely do believe you're either there for commerce, or you're there

Paul Dawalibi:

for marketing like an exposure. And, and for McDonald's. They could probably miss the entire

Paul Dawalibi:

boat on the Commerce piece. And be fine. I think if they miss the boat entirely on the marketing

Paul Dawalibi:

piece and the exposure piece that that's where I worry.

Jeff Cohen:

Yep. It's almost as simple as your brands that are selling the avatars and brands

Jeff Cohen:

that are selling to people, right. So if you're selling stuff in the real world, it's on the

Jeff Cohen:

people. If you're selling stuff in the metaverse to be consumed in the metaverse avatars, I think

Jeff Cohen:

that will be an interesting distinction for brands as they enter the metaverse to kind of parse out

Jeff Cohen:

what their strategy is.

Paul Dawalibi:

Yeah, and and, you know, because a lot of, as we've seen, there's a lot of crossover

Paul Dawalibi:

too, right? Like Nike can sell a physical good, and the digital good. They can sell a good to a

Paul Dawalibi:

real human being and to an avatar. And so that strategy between that sort of, are we doing

Paul Dawalibi:

commerce or are we doing marketing, I think becomes an interesting conversation and seeing

Paul Dawalibi:

where all these brands land. I agree will be interesting to watch. Let's talk about Jeff, let's

Paul Dawalibi:

move on to the game that I think almost everyone listening or watching this show probably is aware

Paul Dawalibi:

of and that's Grand Theft Auto and Grand Theft Auto was in the news because their parent company

Paul Dawalibi:

sort of made a statement about the NFT opportunity. So the headline here is Grand Theft

Paul Dawalibi:

Auto game publisher, highly convinced and this is in quotes by NFT opportunity. Take two's

Paul Dawalibi:

optimistic view on the opportunity in NF T's also comes with caveats and caution around the crypto

Paul Dawalibi:

sectors. Speculative side and they have a quote from our friend Strauss Zelnick, who by the way

Paul Dawalibi:

was on the business of esports podcast. If you're don't know about the business of esports podcast,

Paul Dawalibi:

you should go check out that episode with Strauss Zelnick, who was amazing. But he said he was

Paul Dawalibi:

quoted in this article, he says, we're highly convinced there's an opportunity for NF T's to fit

Paul Dawalibi:

with take two's offerings in the future. He says, We believe in rare goods, we believe in

Paul Dawalibi:

collectibles. The concern we have is that there's speculation going on. We want to make sure that

Paul Dawalibi:

consumers always have a good experience every time they engage with our properties. And losing money

Paul Dawalibi:

on a speculation is not a good experience. So we're going to stay away from speculation. Stress,

Paul Dawalibi:

easily one of the most well respected people in all of gaming take to has been a very massively

Paul Dawalibi:

successful company, obviously, Jeff, what do you think of stress is very concise take here on NF

Paul Dawalibi:

T's and games? Well, I

Jeff Cohen:

think he's pretty spot. So first of all, you'll never hear me say bad thing about

Jeff Cohen:

stress. I feel like he he's pretty spot on about about most things he gives things on, and

Jeff Cohen:

obviously a very well respected person industry. I think he's I think he's right here. I mean, it's

Jeff Cohen:

very obvious. Gamers are willing to buy digital items they see value in digital goods,

Jeff Cohen:

collectibles, scarcity, these are things that are economic certainties. And I think he's right about

Jeff Cohen:

the fact that right now, the NFT market, and then of the gaming market, there's a ton of

Jeff Cohen:

speculation. And to his point, speculation is great when you're the person who buys low and

Jeff Cohen:

sells high, but it's not as great of an experience for the people who buy high and sell low. So I

Jeff Cohen:

think it's a smart way of saying, hey, there's a lot of froth in the market right now, we see that

Jeff Cohen:

there's something here, but we're not going to be the ones diving in at first sticking your neck out

Jeff Cohen:

and kind of ruining the experiences that we've tailored to consumers currently. I think it's very

Jeff Cohen:

similar to what we saw with EA. I think Strauss maybe said it a little bit more diplomatically and

Jeff Cohen:

intelligently, then that Andrew Wilson did. And, you know, he didn't have to walk back prior

Jeff Cohen:

comments, because I know we covered Andrew Wilson, EA CEOs take on last week's episode. So I think

Jeff Cohen:

he's right here. It is interesting to juxtapose it versus Ubisoft, which I know is probably the next

Jeff Cohen:

thing we're talking we'll talk about, but I don't know if there's anything more. I mean, I agree

Jeff Cohen:

with Strauss. I don't know if I can add even more to that.

Paul Dawalibi:

I mean, the question I have for you is, is this first of all? Well, first question, I

Paul Dawalibi:

think you're the one who told me on their earnings call. Correct me if I'm wrong that Strauss didn't

Paul Dawalibi:

make one mention of anything. metaverse.

Jeff Cohen:

I did in fact, I tweeted that actually at Jeff Cohen. 23. Give me a Yeah, I made sure I

Jeff Cohen:

did Ctrl F on the transcript before I tweeted it just to make sure I wouldn't look like an idiot.

Jeff Cohen:

No mention of the word Metaverse, which was pretty striking versus the last couple of earnings calls

Jeff Cohen:

that Activision EA, you know, Facebook, obviously, you know, analysts asking people talking about it.

Jeff Cohen:

No mention of it. I don't know if that is maybe just a signal of where we are in the hype cycle. I

Jeff Cohen:

think Facebook's earnings and then subsequent drop, even though it really had nothing to do with

Jeff Cohen:

Metaverse, maybe put a little bit of a damper in the buzzword. I think you have a little bit of

Jeff Cohen:

fatigue from people that are have jumped in with two feet, maybe? I don't know, what do you make of

Jeff Cohen:

that was just a coincidence?

Paul Dawalibi:

No, because I take that and I put it together with this article. Right? And I'm

Paul Dawalibi:

going and then the EA conversation we had last week and there's sort of this pattern now it seems

Paul Dawalibi:

to me of maybe most of these gaming companies really don't have any strategy or any, like any

Paul Dawalibi:

view whatsoever on where this is going and what they should be doing about it. Like what I'm

Paul Dawalibi:

seeing is a lot of very well constructed sound bites that say a whole lot of nothing. Again, I

Paul Dawalibi:

have the most massive respect for Strauss you know, a friend of the podcast like I think it's

Paul Dawalibi:

this was just a really an he is tremendously good at this. Like this was an incredibly polite and

Paul Dawalibi:

diplomatic way of saying basically nothing, right? Because the truth seems to be that almost every

Paul Dawalibi:

single one of these gaming companies and I'll throw even Activision Blizzard in there, right?

Paul Dawalibi:

That even the ones who gave a lot of lip service to the word metaverse. Most of them really don't

Paul Dawalibi:

know what they're doing. And I don't mean that they they're not smart. I mean, most of them have

Paul Dawalibi:

not formulated any kind of strategy around NF T's or the metaverse or how this affects and plays

Paul Dawalibi:

into their business, short term or long term

Jeff Cohen:

on NF T I think on NF T's you're absolutely right. metaverse. Depends how you

Jeff Cohen:

define Metaverse, because, you know, you could argue some of them are doing a lot of the things

Jeff Cohen:

you would do for them, like Grand Theft Auto Online, basically created 95% of what I would

Jeff Cohen:

consider a Metaverse 510 years ago. So like that, I don't know if I would necessarily agree with the

Jeff Cohen:

NF T's part, I think people got blindsided by it a little bit. I mean, I think NF kind of web three

Jeff Cohen:

gaming and ft gaming is really probably less than a year from a year old in terms of coming into the

Jeff Cohen:

mainstream, like, maybe over this past summer, people really started talking about Axi infinity

Jeff Cohen:

and the ability, like played around kind of crept into the mainstream consciousness. So in the span

Jeff Cohen:

of, you know, massive triple A publisher, and kind of like, how much these guys have going on. That's

Jeff Cohen:

a pretty short period of time to like, that's like one or two board meetings, you know what I mean?

Jeff Cohen:

Like, there are quarters like that's, that's a very short period of time to formulate an entire

Jeff Cohen:

kind of strategy. And there's something I was thinking when you were talking, I'm curious, do

Jeff Cohen:

you equate this like, was there a similar thing with esports, maybe 10 years ago, where the

Jeff Cohen:

attitude toward from publishers was like, we know, this is a thing. It's interesting. We're following

Jeff Cohen:

it. But we don't really know exactly how we're going to be involved, what we're going to do, but

Jeff Cohen:

we know it's important, and we're there, but we, besides that, we don't know what we're doing.

Jeff Cohen:

Because to me, it kind of feels similar.

Paul Dawalibi:

I agreed, I think super insightful. And, and I would I would extend that to just not

Paul Dawalibi:

just esports, right, like every fledgling tech related kind of industry feels like they have a

Paul Dawalibi:

moment like this where everyone recognizes there's something there. I guess what bothers me is it's

Paul Dawalibi:

it's a little bit of just the lip service, right? Like the the statements that say nothing, I just,

Paul Dawalibi:

I'm a I'm a as the Prophet, I'm the truth teller, in my mind, I would much rather them and I know

Paul Dawalibi:

this would never happen to Jeff, the IR guy would never allow this to happen. But like, I'd love the

Paul Dawalibi:

CEO to come out and be like, Look, we know this thing's interesting. We have no clue what we want

Paul Dawalibi:

to do with it yet. Right? Like, yeah, come back to us in two years, and maybe we'll have a good

Paul Dawalibi:

strategy. And I know that like, but that'll never happen. You'll never hear that. No. But that would

Paul Dawalibi:

make me happy. Because I do think that's sort of what's being said here. Just reading between the

Paul Dawalibi:

lines. Yes, that

Jeff Cohen:

is 100%. The translation. A lot better.

Paul Dawalibi:

The way stress said it did sound a hell of a lot better. I want to end here on two

Paul Dawalibi:

stories, I want to put them together. And I just think indicative of, again, the massive

Paul Dawalibi:

opportunity that's being presented in this space right now. The first one here, gala games to

Paul Dawalibi:

expand NFT offerings with $5 billion. It says here in the article since its launch in 2019 Gala

Paul Dawalibi:

games, has been growing steadily, the platform has 1.3 million monthly active users has sold 26,000

Paul Dawalibi:

and fts. The firm in this $5 billion in the $5 billion, they're going to assign here to these

Paul Dawalibi:

expansion efforts. 2 billion is going to be on gaming, 1 billion on music, 1 billion on movies,

Paul Dawalibi:

and the remaining 1 billion on the gala theme park and fts. Aside from the 2 billion budgeted for

Paul Dawalibi:

gaming, the firm also launched $100 million gaming fund with C two ventures, and they're going to

Paul Dawalibi:

invest in new blockchain games. So I just want to park that for a second, by the way Snoop Dogg is

Paul Dawalibi:

gonna miss out on this story. Like we could certainly have done the whole episode, which means

Paul Dawalibi:

then there was another story, which, you know, had we not read that one first would have just also

Paul Dawalibi:

been eyewatering. And this one is Sequoia makes a big bet on web three leading $450 million

Paul Dawalibi:

investment in polygon blockchain. And for those that don't know, polygon is a blockchain network

Paul Dawalibi:

that serves as a support layer to Aetherium. It says here polygon wants to become a decentralized

Paul Dawalibi:

version of Amazon Web Services. And obviously, it has attracted here, Sequoia, maybe one or the

Paul Dawalibi:

other than Andreessen Horowitz. Those two are maybe the biggest names in all of venture capital.

Paul Dawalibi:

And so polygon raising 450 million. Jeff, maybe just your general thoughts on both of these

Paul Dawalibi:

stories. I don't know if you want to start with the gala.

Jeff Cohen:

I mean, that's a coil was the polygon one is interesting. I mean, they're doing great. I

Jeff Cohen:

mean, they just hired Ryan White to kind of run their gaming, Polygon gaming business. It's pretty

Jeff Cohen:

similar how they're trying both these companies are trying to attract games to be built on top of

Jeff Cohen:

their platform. The goal one, I thought was a more interesting article. There's so little more

Jeff Cohen:

numbers. But one thing, the first thing that kind of sticks out to me is just the amount of money

Jeff Cohen:

flowing into this. The fact that it's 1 billion not 1 million, 1 billion with a B is going to be

Jeff Cohen:

invested into gala theme park and fts. That is a mind blowing amount of I don't even know what a

Jeff Cohen:

gala theme park NFT is, but I want to go start a company that builds them. Because there's a

Jeff Cohen:

billion dollars being funded on these things. that's mind blowing. And I think I tweeted this

Jeff Cohen:

saying like, would, too, with this much capital flowing into kind of the web three gaming space,

Jeff Cohen:

you're bound to see a few mainstream hits in the next call it 18 months, the knock that we've come

Jeff Cohen:

back to time and time again, with web three, gaming, Blockchain gaming is a games aren't fun.

Jeff Cohen:

And that has largely been true. So far, with this much money coming into the space, someone's going

Jeff Cohen:

to build a fun good game, where you're going to see a game that goes mainstream and blows up way,

Jeff Cohen:

way on a way bigger scale than an xe currently, the second number that strikes me and terrifies me

Jeff Cohen:

a little bit, when I'm thinking about this, is, if you scroll up a little bit for people watching, it

Jeff Cohen:

said 1.3 million now this time, million with an M, monthly active users on the platform. Yeah, that

Jeff Cohen:

is really, really, really low. If you think about the current, you know, smartphone, addressable

Jeff Cohen:

market, there's like 7 billion people with a smartphone. And the amount of money that's being

Jeff Cohen:

invested into mobile games right now is probably less than $5 billion in a year, maybe that that's

Jeff Cohen:

a little bit off. But the point is, there's a ton of money chasing a market that currently just

Jeff Cohen:

isn't that large. And I think we all are very bullish on it, and believe that the addressable

Jeff Cohen:

market will dramatically expand. But right now, this is a really, really, really niche market. And

Jeff Cohen:

there's going to be a lot of capital that's burn chasing, chasing this, because not every project

Jeff Cohen:

can work. But the addressable market

Paul Dawalibi:

isn't really that different here. I get they only have 1.3 million monthly active

Paul Dawalibi:

users today. But is gala games total addressable market, any different than Zynga has total

Paul Dawalibi:

addressable market? Or kings? total addressable market? Like, and I go back to your first point,

Paul Dawalibi:

which is, you know, one day we're going to make a good game, or, or it will, the the industry is

Paul Dawalibi:

going to prove one of my thesis I have, which is the as a function of being a, a blockchain based

Paul Dawalibi:

game, they're fundamentally just glorified pyramid schemes. And that means you have to make a game

Paul Dawalibi:

that allows for a pyramid scheme, and therefore the game may never be games may never be good,

Paul Dawalibi:

right? Like, yeah, I would love for you to be right here, Jeff, and that it's just a matter of

Paul Dawalibi:

someone being a little bit more creative. That gets a game to, you know, a billion users and, you

Paul Dawalibi:

know, wow, kind of longevity and success. And, and then it's, it just so happens to be a blockchain

Paul Dawalibi:

based game, and maybe gala games. This is where that $2 billion of investment in gaming goes, I

Paul Dawalibi:

don't know, right to solve those problems. But I'm a bit of a skeptic here. Also, I just where I'm

Paul Dawalibi:

not a skeptic, is I think the total addressable markets. No different, right? Well, anyone today.

Jeff Cohen:

So I think you're right, in terms of the total addressable market, if you define it as

Jeff Cohen:

gamers, then yes, but the question is, do you define the addressable market as anyone who

Jeff Cohen:

theoretically could go play a game on this, or anyone who's on the platform currently? Because if

Jeff Cohen:

I, if I were to ask you, if you were a Roblox developer, what is your addressable market? Would

Jeff Cohen:

you say, well, there's, you know, 12 billion people on the earth. So technically, they all

Jeff Cohen:

could play Roblox games. Or would you say, well, Roblox has 50 million? Da us? That's what the

Jeff Cohen:

addressable market is.

Paul Dawalibi:

I mean, that's different. You see my Gala. Because, yeah, I see your point. But gala

Paul Dawalibi:

here actually develops games, right? They're not, they're not necessarily just the platform for

Paul Dawalibi:

other people to develop games, right. So that, to me, the 1.3 million is across all the games that

Paul Dawalibi:

they've produced and distributed. I think it's it's not unreasonable to define the total

Paul Dawalibi:

addressable market for gala games as whatever the total addressable market is for mobile gaming.

Paul Dawalibi:

Right, like it made their own mobile games fundamentally, you know, the fact that they're

Paul Dawalibi:

blockchain based games in the background and you need a crypto wallet when you sign up. Doesn't to

Paul Dawalibi:

me change really the total addressable market that drastically so I think it's an interesting point,

Paul Dawalibi:

that the number is low. But obviously, the billions that are being spent is because they

Paul Dawalibi:

think this essentially consumes mobile gaming. That's That's my guess. Right? That has to be part

Paul Dawalibi:

of the thesis here. Yeah. And I would argue, with part with the polygon story that's got To be part

Paul Dawalibi:

of sequoias thesis as well right that whatever people are going to build on polygon has a total

Paul Dawalibi:

addressable market that is far beyond the narrow scope of web three as it stands today or crypto as

Paul Dawalibi:

it stands today now yeah person they chose to go to go help manage that that's a different that's a

Paul Dawalibi:

different issue. But this is you know, to me this is two totally different plays right polygons and

Paul Dawalibi:

infrastructure play gal is much, much more b2c Where I'm amazed with gala frankly, and I

Paul Dawalibi:

surprised surprised you didn't you jump on this because I thought you'd be bothered by this is

Paul Dawalibi:

like the billion dollars on music and the billion dollars on movies. When you're fundamentally sort

Paul Dawalibi:

of you're I mean, you're called gala games you're a gaming company they

Jeff Cohen:

clearly say You know, I can't take all the I can't take all the good the good juicy

Jeff Cohen:

things

Paul Dawalibi:

but you know, maybe they're gala games is just there's a learning here that maybe

Paul Dawalibi:

every game developer should be opening their eyes to right like maybe Activision Blizzard should

Paul Dawalibi:

have a a an equal like a proportionately large budget for for music and movies based on their IP

Paul Dawalibi:

in the same way gala games has allocated you know 40% of this $5 billion dollars to those two things

Paul Dawalibi:

I think is interesting so maybe they're just ahead of the curve and and and if the blockchain base

Paul Dawalibi:

games are leading the way in some of these things that to me makes me makes me less skeptical at the

Paul Dawalibi:

very least right Jeff like cuz we complain all the time Activision Blizzard should be making movies

Paul Dawalibi:

and TV shows. And now you've got a blockchain based gaming company that budgets $2 billion for

Paul Dawalibi:

this stuff. I knew a great article if we didn't applaud it and say, you know, good job, or at

Paul Dawalibi:

least a nice, good, good for you to try.

Jeff Cohen:

No, no arguments for me hear.

Paul Dawalibi:

That brings us Jeff to the end of the podcast. I feel like that flew by. For those

Paul Dawalibi:

of you who are enjoying it, please go leave a review on Apple podcasts on Spotify, Google Play

Paul Dawalibi:

wherever you get the podcast. leave a review helps other people to find the podcast, share it with

Paul Dawalibi:

your friends. We really appreciate it. Of course. We appreciate you listening watching, but we want

Paul Dawalibi:

to grow it as big as possible. Jeff, thank you as always, and see all of you guys next week.

Unknown:

Thanks for joining us here on meta business. Make sure to subscribe to this podcast

Unknown:

everywhere you get your podcasts, leave a five star review and tell your friends, family and

Unknown:

colleagues all about us. Also, make sure to follow metta TV on all socials to get more of the best

Unknown:

Metaverse content anywhere. Tune in every week for another episode of meta business

Listen for free

Show artwork for META Business

About the Podcast

META Business
From the metaverse to the boardroom...
Meta Business tackles the most important Metaverse industry news. Business experts dissect and discuss all of the hottest topics and happenings, from a unique C-suite perspective.

About your host

Profile picture for Paul Dawalibi

Paul Dawalibi